The White House opposes breed-specific legislation  »


Laura’s Hazel being a goof.

Though I was once again disappointed that the Obama family chose to buy a dog rather than adopt, I am pleased the White House has come out against BSL:

We don’t support breed-specific legislation — research shows that bans on certain types of dogs are largely ineffective and often a waste of public resources.

In 2000, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention looked at twenty years of data about dog bites and human fatalities in the United States. They found that fatal attacks represent a very small proportion of dog bite injuries to people and that it’s virtually impossible to calculate bite rates for specific breeds.

The CDC also noted that the types of people who look to exploit dogs aren’t deterred by breed regulations — when their communities establish a ban, these people just seek out new, unregulated breeds. And the simple fact is that dogs of any breed can become dangerous when they’re intentionally or unintentionally raised to be aggressive.

For all those reasons, the CDC officially recommends against breed-specific legislation — which they call inappropriate.¬†You can read more from them here.

Love it! You go, CDC!

page 1 of 1
Tumblr » powered Sid05 » templated